CaptainJim, thanks for asking an intelligent question. Bloody Bill Anderson had at least one brother who survived the War. That was James. It is also possible that Ellis survived but the traditionalists have done an excellent job of covering up his tracks just as they refuse to give the full middle name of Bloody Bill's father, William C. Anderson.
Any covering up of James Anderson's tracks was most likely done by Jim himself, as he seems to have had a murder charge hanging over him. To the best of my knowledge, no one has found any document that contains Wm. C. Anderson's (the father of Wm. T. Anderson) full name, and if one did, they would publish the find. "Traditionalist" (I prefer the term "responsible") historians rely on the best evidence available, then draw their conclusions from that evidence rather than drawing a conclusion and then cherry-picking the evidence that might support it.
The traditionalists also fail to account for the reasons historians Shelby Foote and Dr. Richard S. Brownlee specifically said, in their books, that Bloody Bill Anderson's full name was "William C. Anderson" - just like his father. They had rather avoid this blatant fact of history because it shreds their William T. "Bloody Bill" Anderson myth to pieces.
This has been dealt with in the past. Brownlee made an error in his
Gray Ghosts of the Confederacy, and Foote -- using that work as one of the sources for his trilogy -- merely repeated Brownlee's earlier error. The perpetuation of an author's error by those who follow is a common occurance.
They cannot even say, or won't say, when the famous Jim Anderson died or where he is buried. Yet they all crowd together when their myth is challenged with cold hard historical facts and reason.
Since the contemporary accounts of Jim's death are sketchy, there are no known surviving newspaper accounts of it, and it reportedly occurred prior to the requirement for death certificates, no responsible historian can or will speculate on it without including a disclaimer citing the lack of documentation. If you have any "cold hard historical facts" regarding the matter, trot them out.
When pressed on any issue, the traditionalists and their mouthpieces simply resort to making cheap and false personal attacks and unfounded allegations. What else can they do?
~Jay~
While I have seen a number of snide remarks posted about the poor quality of your research, I have yet to see anything untrue in them.
Doc